Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Label-Conscious Global Shopper – Only Partly Understanding Food Labels, but Selective Nonetheless Trust and Healthy Living, not Fad Diet Options

The Label-Conscious Global Shopper – Only Partly Understanding Food Labels, but Selective Nonetheless Trust and Healthy Living, not Fad Diet Options.

ACNielsen's latest findings on understanding food labels.

Kuala Lumpar (PRWEB) August 23, 2005

- Half the world’s consumers understand the nutritional labels on food packaging only ‘in part’, just two in 10 ‘always’ check grocery labels, four in 10 do so only when buying a product for the first time and nearly three in 10 check them when buying certain food types, according to a study released today by ACNielsen, the world’s leading marketing research and information company.

The twice-yearly global ACNielsen Online Consumer Opinion Survey, the largest of its kind, polled over 21,100 respondents in 38 markets from Europe, Asia Pacific, North America, Latin America and South Africa (See Table 1 for country breakdown). The study asked consumers around the world how much they understand food labeling, when they would check labels and what they check for as they do their grocery shopping.

On average, one fifth of consumers in Asia Pacific, Europe and North America ‘always’ check the nutritional labels on packaging, with Latin Americans the most label-minded, where a third of consumers claim to ‘always’ check labels on packaged food (Table 2). The most likely occasion for checking the nutritional label, not surprisingly, for an average of four in 10 consumers worldwide, was when trying a product for the first time.

“For manufacturers of packaged goods, the product’s nutritional proposition - whether it appeals to the specific selection criteria of the consumer - and the clarity of the information on the nutrition panel are critical at the point of product trial. Whether the product ‘contents’ meet the consumers’ selection criteria, and how easily the label is understood, can determine whether or not the consumer proceeds to purchase the product, or return it to the shelf,” said Steve Watt, managing director, ACNielsen Malaysia.

Across Asia Pacific, Thailand (41%), India (32%) and Malaysia (29%) made the world’s top ten countries where people claimed to “always” check food labels. At the other end of the scale, those most likely to ‘never’ check food labels were the Japanese (24%), followed by the Finnish (15%) and Dutch (14%). (Table 3)

“Local culture may strongly influence whether or not consumers check food labels. In Japan, for example, consumers place a high level of trust in well-known manufacturers not to produce foodstuffs that could do them harm, and given the strict legal restrictions, believe that only products of the highest quality make it to the shelves. One could argue that in markets where there is a high level of label checking, there is less trust in manufacturers to do the right thing by the consumer,” said Mr Watt.

And while consumers are checking labels, they don’t necessarily understand what they’re reading. Half of the world’s consumers said they only ‘partly’ understand the nutritional labels on food, with 60% of Asia Pacific’s residents leading the world in this lack of understanding, followed by Europeans (50%) and Latin Americans (45%). Most conversant with food labeling were the North Americans, with 64 percent claiming to ‘mostly’ understand food panels.

Out of the 13 Asia Pacific countries, New Zealand was the only country making it into the world top 10 list of understanding food labels, with 61 percent of Kiwis claiming to ‘mostly’ understand information on food labels. One in ten consumers in Japan, Korea and Hong Kong however claim they didn’t understand the labels at all. (Table 4)

“It is critical for manufacturers to make their labeling as relevant and clear to their consumers as they can, given consumers are increasingly making purchase choices based on the information on the packaging. If they can’t understand the label, they may not risk the purchase,” said Mr Watt.

Globally, the ingredients most likely to be checked for by consumers were Fat (49%), Calories (43%), Sugar (42%), Preservatives (40%), Coloring and Additives (36% each). Not surprisingly among the five regions surveyed, consumers in North America and Latin America topped the list for most regularly checking out Fat, Calorie and Sugar levels.

Within Asia Pacific, the ranking of importance differed from the West, with Preservatives (47%), Fat (45%), Coloring (43%), Additives (42%), and Calories (42%) garnering the most attention from consumers.

Further, when asked whether they knew the distinct difference between Saturated and Unsaturated Fat, a global average of 56 percent claimed to, which was fairly consistent across all regions surveyed. On the other hand, among the top 10 markets claiming not to know the difference, the Japanese ranked number one (73%) followed by two thirds of the French (69%), Taiwanese (63%) and Chinese (61%).

“Consumers the world over are screening out products containing ingredients they consider to be unhealthy for them, and making their own personal decisions about levels of fat, sugar, etc. In developing markets, consumers appear to be more concerned about preservatives and additives than they are about calories, while in developed markets consumer focus is on screening out products with contents that make them gain weight, and may reflect the obesity battle being faced in a number of these markets,” said Mr Watt.

And after all the hype about the Atkins and other low carb diets, consumers appear to be more interested in screening out other ingredients first, with a global average of just 28 percent claiming to check for the amount of carbohydrates on labels. Carbs were of most interest to Latin Americans (44%) and North Americans (37%).

And the latest diet craze, the Low GI diet (Glycemic Index), registered for only 11 percent of consumers globally, lead by South Africans (17%) and Latin Americans (22%). Only eight percent of North Americans checked for Low GI on labels.

Phil Lempert, a food trends analyst and ACNielsen consultant in the U. S., said some of the findings can be attributed to what information is currently available on product labels. “Relatively few people check the glycemic index because very few companies are including the information on the labels of products sold. But that will soon change. The glycemic index is set to become the next big thing in the food industry because it takes carbohydrates to the next level – from the amount of carbs a product contains to the impact that the carb level will have on a person’s weight and energy.”

Indeed, when asked whether they had heard about the GI, 59 percent of global consumers claimed not to have heard of it, and only 34% across Asia Pacific. However, of the top 10 markets to have heard of the GI, Australia ranked number one (82%), followed by Korea (80%) and New Zealand (76%), suggesting that the diet craze is generating publicity in some countries more than others.

“As our survey findings suggest, consumers are making their own choices based on little real understanding. Greater education on food ingredients and labeling is a must and the pressure is on food manufacturers and packaging companies to simplify the message and garner greater trust among consumers in their product claims,” said Mr Watt.

About ACNielsen

ACNielsen, a VNU business, is the world's leading marketing information provider. Offering services in more than 100 countries, the unit provides measurement and analysis of marketplace dynamics and consumer attitudes and behavior. Clients rely on ACNielsen's market research, proprietary products, analytical tools and professional service to understand competitive performance, to uncover new opportunities and to raise the profitability of their marketing and sales campaigns. To learn more, visit www. acnielsen. com.

###